Hydrogen’s safety challenges: balancing risk and opportunity
Hydrogen’s rise in the global energy transition demands a deep understanding of its unique properties to ensure safe handling and effective risk mitigation. Like more familiar fuels such as natural gas, hydrogen exhibits behaviors that significantly influence its safety profile, requiring distinct strategies to manage associated risks.
One such characteristic is hydrogen’s broad flammability range, which extends from 4% to 75% by volume, dwarfing that of natural gas, which ignites within a narrower 5.3% to 15% range. As a result, hydrogen can more readily form flammable mixtures in the air, heightening the risk of ignition across a wider spectrum of conditions. Additionally, the energy required to ignite hydrogen is remarkably low – only 0.020 millijoules (mJ), compared to the 0.290 mJ needed for natural gas. This means even a static spark can set off a hydrogen explosion, necessitating stringent control measures to prevent accidental ignition, especially in environments where electronic devices or human contact are common.
Hydrogen’s flame velocity, measured at 3.2 meters per second, is eight times faster than that of natural gas. This leads to a significantly higher potential for explosive pressure buildup. In the event of ignition, the resulting explosion could be far more severe than one involving natural gas, demanding robust containment and mitigation strategies. Hydrogen’s low density and high diffusivity also mean that under similar conditions, it flows out of leaks 2.8 times faster than methane, leading to rapid depressurization and potentially larger flammable clouds. If ignited, hydrogen burns quickly, potentially shortening the duration of the fire but increasing the intensity and immediate danger.
Despite these risks, hydrogen’s rapid dispersion into the atmosphere – thanks to its low molecular weight – can reduce the likelihood of hazardous gas clouds forming at ground level, offering a potential safety advantage over heavier gases like natural gas. However, this characteristic does not eliminate the risk of ignition, especially in confined spaces where hydrogen can accumulate.
Hydrogen’s complex safety profile underscores the need for sophisticated risk management strategies. While its properties necessitate rigorous safety measures, they also offer some advantages in terms of risk mitigation, particularly regarding dispersion. Understanding these traits is the first step toward safely integrating new hydrogen technologies and assets into the existing energy and manufacturing industries as critical factors in emission reductions and achieving climate targets.
Navigating barriers and safety philosophies in hydrogen risk management
The safe deployment of hydrogen hinges on robust design philosophies that systematically address potential hazards. This approach, known as the safety hierarchy, ranges from eliminating risks to managing the consequences of incidents, ensuring that each stage of hydrogen use is controlled.
- Avoidance – eliminating hazards: The most effective safety strategy is to eliminate hazards altogether. However, as hydrogen becomes indispensable to the clean energy transition, small and contained volumes are not possible, and large quantities will have to be stored and transported. Instead, the focus shifts to minimizing the presence of hydrogen in vulnerable areas, such as reducing storage quantities in high-risk zones or relocating infrastructure away from populated regions.
- Prevention – reducing the likelihood of Loss of Containment (LoC): The next line of defense after minimizing volumes is prevention – reducing the likelihood of hydrogen escaping its containment. This involves rigorous engineering practices, high-quality materials, and adherence to stringent industry standards to ensure hydrogen remains securely contained, thereby reducing the risk of leaks.
- Control – limiting the scale and duration of LoC events: Despite the best preventive efforts, the possibility of a hydrogen leak cannot be entirely ruled out. Control measures are therefore critical, involving strategies like gas detection systems and emergency shutdown procedures that rapidly isolate the affected area, preventing a small leak from escalating into a catastrophic event.
- Mitigation – protecting people and assets: Mitigation focuses on reducing the impact of incidents when they occur. This includes installing protective barriers, implementing ventilation systems to disperse hydrogen, and using fire-resistant materials to shield assets. Effective emergency response protocols are also crucial, ensuring swift evacuation and coordinated efforts to contain any damage.
- Emergency response – preparing for LoC: The final layer in the safety hierarchy is emergency response, which is activated when all other measures have failed. Comprehensive emergency plans, including evacuation procedures and coordination with first responders, are essential to minimize harm and contain the situation quickly and effectively.
The practical application of this safety philosophy can be visualized through the Swiss cheese model of layered barriers, where each layer aims to block hazards from leading to an incident. However, much like in Swiss cheese, each barrier has its inherent ‘holes’ or vulnerabilities. The cumulative effect of multiple barriers significantly reduces the likelihood of a catastrophic failure.
With large-scale modules and plants, which are not yet standardized, the total risk acceptance level has to be well estimated and documented.
Understanding threats and implementing barriers
Hydrogen containment faces several potential threats, including corrosion, over-pressurization, and mechanical failures. Addressing these threats involves implementing a multi-faceted approach across various operational aspects Ensuring the use of high-quality materials, adhering to stringent maintenance schedules, and complying with established safety standards are fundamental to minimizing risks in plant and equipment. Regular inspections and proactive maintenance play a pivotal role in preventing equipment failures that could lead to hazardous situations.
In addition to physical measures, rigorous procedural controls are essential for managing hydrogen safely. This includes robust work management protocols and Permit to Work (PTW) systems that govern the conditions under which work is conducted, ensuring that every activity involving hydrogen is carried out with the highest safety standards.
Training and awareness programs are also critical to maintaining safety. It is vital to ensure that all personnel are well informed about safety protocols and fully understand their roles in risk management. This helps prevent human error and ensures compliance with safety procedures.
Navigating data and automation challenges
As hydrogen systems become increasingly automated, effective data management is crucial. Operators are tasked with interpreting and acting on data from various sensors and control systems. Challenges include managing large volumes of data and preventing information overload, which can obscure critical warnings. To address these issues, advancements such as digital twins and enhanced data management practices are being developed. These innovations help operators maintain control, respond promptly to anomalies, and ensure that safety measures are consistently applied.
Layered barriers in action: gas detection and response systems
The use of gas detection systems with multiple layers is a frontline defense against hydrogen leaks, equipped with various technologies to ensure rapid and accurate responses. Ultrasonic sensors are employed for leak detection to detect the sound pressure of a gas leak, providing early warning capabilities in high-pressure environments. These sensors enable swift emergency shutdowns, mitigating the risk before it escalates.
Point catalytic bead and electrochemical sensors are used for gas detection (molecules/vapor) to measure hydrogen concentrations in the air. These systems trigger ventilation, alert personnel, and initiate emergency shutdowns based on the detected gas levels, ensuring that leaks are promptly addressed.
For fire detection (heat), UV/IR detectors are designed to identify hydrogen flames, which may be to the naked eye. By offering rapid response times and extensive coverage, these detectors play a crucial role in preventing explosions and ensuring timely interventions.
Integration with control systems
Upon detecting a hydrogen leak, a series of automated and manual responses are activated:
- Alarms: Alerts are issued to control rooms, site alarms, and rescue services, ensuring that all relevant parties are informed of the potential hazard.
- Shutdowns: Automatic shutdown procedures are implemented to halt the flow of hydrogen, preventing further leakage and mitigating the risk of an incident.
- Ventilation and flaring: Emergency systems are activated to disperse or safely burn off hydrogen, reducing the risk of hazardous accumulation and potential explosions.
- Evacuation: Procedures are established to ensure the safe evacuation of personnel, minimizing the risk to human life and ensuring that emergency response protocols are followed.
Towards comprehensive risk management
Effectively managing the risks associated with hydrogen requires a comprehensive approach that spans every stage of its use. From preventing risks through design and procedural controls to preparing for effective emergency response, each level of the safety hierarchy is critical. By systematically applying these principles and leveraging advanced detection technologies, the hydrogen industry can mitigate inherent risks and unlock clean hydrogen’s full potential as an important component for emission reductions for hard-to-abate sectors in the global energy transition.
Innovations and regulatory advances: shaping the future of hydrogen safety
As clean hydrogen scales up, its regulation and standardization are evolving – some say not rapidly enough – to address its unique challenges. Developing a robust regulatory framework requires a multi-layered approach, encompassing international, regional, and local regulations, as well as industry standards and best practices.
Regulatory and standardization needs
Regulating hydrogen spans multiple dimensions, from international agreements and regional directives to national laws and industry standards. Organizations like the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) are at the forefront of updating and creating technical guidelines that ensure the safe and efficient use of hydrogen.
In recent years, several key standards have been developed and are being updated based on gap assessments by industry panels to address the safety and operational challenges of new and larger-scale hydrogen production and use, including standards for electrolyzer design, pipeline repurposing, and large-scale storage solutions like hydrogen salt caverns. These standards are critical as they provide a common framework for the industry to follow, ensuring consistency and safety across global hydrogen projects.
DNV’s work contributes to the hydrogen sector in this respect by supporting regulatory compliance and assisting in the development of best practices that serve as a foundation for new standards. Its management of Joint Industry Projects (JIPs) plays a role in shaping guidelines that facilitate the industry’s move towards standardization. DNV has recently issued several publications designed to address the safety and operational requirements of hydrogen facilities and equipment, which can be found in DNV’s standards library. Selected examples include:
- Verification of PtX Facilities (DNV-SE-0656): Guidelines for verifying Power-to-X (PtX) facilities to ensure they meet established safety and performance standards.
- Electrolyser Design and Performance (DNV-ST-J301): Specifications for the design and performance of electrolyzers, essential for hydrogen production, aimed at ensuring their reliability.
- Hydrogen Readiness and Repurposing of Pipelines and Infrastructure (DNV-SE-0657): Standards for adapting existing pipelines and infrastructure for hydrogen, focusing on technical and safety aspects.
- Verification and Certification of Power-to-X Equipment (DNV-SE-0674): Frameworks for the verification and certification of PtX equipment to ensure compliance with industry standards.
- Verification of Attribute Claims for Hydrogen and Ammonia (DNV-SE-0654): Standards for verifying claims related to the attributes of hydrogen and ammonia, aimed at ensuring market transparency.
DNV is also preparing to address challenges related to larger-scale hydrogen storage in salt caverns. These structures are critical for enabling hydrogen to provide decarbonized energy security and balance variable production with more constant offtake. However, the gaps in safety and operational challenges must be addressed. An ongoing JIP for materials and a forthcoming JIP will focus on developing updated safety standards to manage challenges effectively, complementing more than 20 other salt cavern initiatives globally.
Technological, commercial, and regulatory readiness
The maturity of hydrogen technologies can be assessed using readiness scales such as the Technology Readiness Level (TRL) and the Commercial Readiness Index (CRI). These metrics help gauge the progress of hydrogen technologies from basic research to full commercial deployment, highlighting the need for continued innovation, robust regulatory support, and substantial financial investment to bring hydrogen to market scale.
The iteration between technology readiness, commercialization, and regulatory innovation for both safety and documentation of emissions reductions is ongoing and crucial to scaling the industry, with contributions from both the industry and policymakers, along with regulatory bodies and ministries.
Conclusion: safeguarding the future of hydrogen
Just as managing risks was crucial for integrating natural gas and hydrocarbons, the future of hydrogen depends on effectively navigating its unique challenges. For hydrogen to play a key role in achieving climate targets, we must rapidly yet cautiously integrate it into our existing industry and energy systems.
As hydrogen infrastructure grows, including in closer proximity to public areas, maintaining effective safety measures and regulatory support is essential. By aligning innovation, regulation, and collaboration, we can unlock clean hydrogen’s potential and drive a sustainable energy transition.
The path forward for renewable and low-carbon hydrogen involves clear, robust, and adaptable regulatory frameworks, continuous technological advancements, and substantial financial support. By addressing these areas concurrently and embracing a proactive, layered approach to risk management, the hydrogen industry can overcome its challenges. International collaboration on regulatory standards will be vital to unlocking hydrogen’s full potential as a clean energy carrier and feedstock, propelling us toward a sustainable future.
About the author
